HOLY! feast or famine

928mac;10653 wrote: OMG James this is not a serious post. You have to much on your mind.

You got that right... to much stress I don't need for sure!

SeanR;10864 wrote: I'll be sure to send Sterling over here to see what kind of a thread was started about him with out him knowing about it.

I'm sure he will be very pleased to see this from someone who he doesn't know.

Real classy Mac.

Mr Sean Ratts,
You should really relax.
This is part of a thread that is running on RL, But you must know this so what's up?
Why are you so upset
I hold Sterling in very high regards and think he has one of the most awesome cars out there.

928mac;10890 wrote: Mr Sean Ratts,
You should really relax.
This is part of a thread that is running on RL, But you must know this so what's up?
Why are you so upset
I hold Sterling in very high regards and think he has one of the most awesome cars out there.

Seems as though someone might be reaching here to create a conflict that doesn't exist.

KilnRed;10898 wrote: Seems as though someone might be reaching here to create a conflict that doesn't exist.

I really don't know why Sean is tic'd

I thought he started the pussy thread on RL and I was trying to add some fun into a forum that is way to serious lately.

If he thinks it will upset Sterling I will delete it as I don't want to upset Sterling more than he is.

Maybe we can start a thread (Brad is a pussy) that may make a few happy.

I have notice that a lot of our regulars have not posted since the election

I suspect many of the regulars are back on the heels wondering what happened to their polite forum...

Stan.Shaw@Excell.Net;10900 wrote: I suspect many of the regulars are back on the heels wondering what happened to their polite forum...

Now we're getting somewhere!

Brad, you do not know the group in Texas very well, neither do I, but I met many of them in Kansas and they're obviously a tight group. the RL thread was inside joke between 928 like minded folks who know each other very well. I suspect recent personal developments make the 'inside joke' no longer appropriate hence the sensitivity.

There was reference in another thread now closed that there was a impromtu board meeting at OCIC, there was not. Only that we had an onsite inperson corum of board members where we could openly discuss a great many matters. Other than online I do not know if there was ever a face to face meet in the last few years. Hope that adds clarity for the members reading and for the members who were at OCIC.

Malcolm,

Can you explain why you just edited Stan's post to me? Was this a mistake??